The Book of the Dead: a practical manual or theological text?
Cicero's letters to Atticus are the most humanizing documents from the late Roman Republic. Written across nearly thirty years, they cover the entire catastrophic collapse of Republican government, but they're also filled with requests for books, gossip about mutual friends, complaints about his daughter's marriage, anxiety about his debts, and the ordinary texture of an elite Roman life.
What makes the letters historically valuable beyond their personal interest is their immediacy. They weren't written for publication — unlike Cicero's speeches and philosophical works, they weren't polished. The Cicero of the letters is often frightened, uncertain, self-pitying, and occasionally petty. He changes his mind about Caesar multiple times across the correspondence. He recognizes that the Republic is dying and doesn't know what to do about it.
The letters were preserved by Atticus, who apparently kept everything, and then by Atticus' heirs. Petrarch's discovery of a collection in 1345 was one of the founding events of Renaissance humanism. The emotional directness of Cicero's private letters was shocking to medieval readers accustomed to more formal Latin.
Atticus himself is an interesting figure — a wealthy equestrian who maintained friendships with figures on all sides of the civil wars and survived them all through studied neutrality. His friendship with Cicero, across decades of political upheaval, is documented more fully than almost any relationship in ancient history.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts.