Is Scorsese worth getting into in 2025?
A case for John Carpenter's The Thing as a nearly perfect horror film.
The Thing works on every level on which horror can work. It's scary in the immediate sense: it has moments of physical revulsion that are among the most effective in the genre. It's scary in the sustained sense: the paranoia and isolation of the Antarctic setting create a dread that accumulates across the film's runtime. And it's scary in the philosophical sense: it raises questions about identity and trust that don't resolve.
But what distinguishes it as nearly perfect rather than merely excellent is Rob Bottin's practical effects work. The transformations in The Thing are disturbing in a way that CGI cannot replicate because they are physically present on camera. The actors are reacting to something actually there. The physical reality of the effects creates an uncanny register that digital effects, which exist in post-production rather than on set, cannot access.
The ending is also correct. It offers no resolution and no comfort. It earns its nihilism by building toward it honestly.