F

Film Discussion

— Analysis, recommendations, and hot takes on cinema
50 members Created Jun 2026
This thread is archived

Rashomon made me fundamentally reconsider what films claim to be showing us

Question

Ran (1985) is Kurosawa's greatest formal achievement and the most expensive Japanese film ever made at the time of its production.

The film is adapted from King Lear but Kurosawa spent years developing the story before acknowledging the connection. His own version — an aging warlord who divides his domain among three sons — was based on a different Japanese historical legend, and the Lear parallel emerged from that independently.

What makes Ran formally extraordinary is how Kurosawa uses the landscape. The battles are filmed from a distance that removes them from heroism. You see columns of soldiers moving across plains the way you watch weather moving across a valley. The scale removes individual agency from the violence, which is the film's argument: history is not made by heroes but by forces that exceed individual comprehension.

The use of color — the three sons distinguished by red, yellow, and blue throughout the film — is a formalism that most directors would have considered too bold. In Ran it works because the film is already operating at the register of fable. The color coding isn't naturalistic because it doesn't need to be.

6
Thread is archived — no new replies

Could not load comments

Report thread

Why are you reporting this thread?

Restore the redacted content?

This will make it visible to everyone again. The clear action is logged in the mod log.