Folk-punk and the open mic as cultural institution
Lo-fi and the way it changes your relationship to a record over multiple listens is something I find interesting.
With a clean, well-produced record, the first listen is usually the most revealing — you hear everything clearly and the production isn't hiding anything. Subsequent listens are about finding things you missed or appreciating things you already knew were there.
With a lo-fi record, the relationship is sometimes inverted. The first listen can be more about adjusting to the production — learning to filter out the noise floor, learning to follow the melodies through the saturation — than about fully hearing the music. Subsequent listens, once your ear has calibrated to the specific production space of the record, can reveal things that were inaudible on the first pass.
This is one of the arguments for lo-fi records as objects that reward extended engagement. They're not designed for passive discovery; they require active listening in a way that rewards the time investment.